Thursday, June 24, 2010
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Ways of Indian Railways
Ways of Indian Railways under the
Background:
May 16 2010.New
The stampede took place at platform numbers 12 and 13 at about 1450 hrs IST after last minute changes in the platform number from where the Bihar Sampark Kranti was to depart (CNN IBN).
May 17 2010:
The decision came on Sunday night in the wake of a stampede in the railway station which claimed two lives and injured many others. (PTI)
The Impact
On June 1, a young mother in her early 30s had to board the evening Shatabadi at Ludhiana Station. She had two small kids (4 yrs and a toddler) with her. The train stops at
The same night, her relatives in
This is the way our hyper-active hyper- political Railway Minister runs the Railway Ministry.
First the Ministry claims that there was no stampede. Just some people slipped n fell and caused all the problem.
Then stop the people from coming to the Railway Station. Viola ! No more stampedes.
Naxalites derail a train. Stop running the trains at night. Voila No more derailments! (How we wish that the Aviation Minister takes a leaf out of her book n stops Air
I am praying very hard for her to win the next State Assembly Elections and become Chief Minister of
MERCY PETITIONS - BY SENIORITY!
20 Sep 2009: The Supreme Court has said that the Government has a duty to decide on the Mercy Petitions of those sentenced to death without much delay.(zee news.com)
20 July 2009: The President is set to discuss with PM Dr. Manmohan Singh the 26 Mercy Petitions that are pending with her………Recently the home ministry decided to clear one mercy petition every month in chronological order. Afzal Guru is 22nd in a list of 28 pending……. (express.india.com) .
Questions that arise:
1.Why not the President Decide? The Mercy Petition is a plea for mercy from the sovereign. It is not an appeal of sorts to be decided on legal, factual basis. That process is exhausted when the Supreme Court has upheld death Sentence. Therefore is it NOT the prerogative of the President rather than of the low functionaries in state n central governments to ‘support/oppose”? So why the President has to await inputs from GOI, who in turn await inputs from State Governor, who in turn awaits inputs from the State Government and so on. And any one of them can stall the entire process and negate all the work done by the country’s slowing moving judicial System.
2.Is it because the President has to act on advice of the Cabinet?
I grant that constitutional possibility. In that case the buck should stop with the Cabinet. And should not start the game of ‘pass-the-buck’ down and up the line.
3.Why in Chronological Order? Each case of death penalty stands on its own merits and has undergone its own long journey through the courts. Similarly the grounds for Mercy and facts-of-the-case are unique in itself. One case has nothing absolutely to do with the other (most of the time). Is this ‘seniority’ system so ingrained in the mindset of the Government machinery that even death penalty must also be executed based on seniority; mercy petitions must also be decided based on seniority? It will take a ‘criminal’ lawyer to clarify whether any statute prescribes such seniority system.
4.Why not fast track cases of National Importance?
It was a wise decision of the Government to appoint a Special court to try out the case of the 26/11 perpetrators. This was done in view of the overwhelming nature of the crime against the State and citizenry of
5.Have we not learnt lessons from the Past?
Are waiting for another Indian Airlines aircraft being hijacked and release of XYZ prisoner being demanded as ransom? Are we giving in to the anti-capital punishment lobby by taken ‘no action’; prolonging the criminal’s imprisonment and thus building an alibi that he has served Life Imprisonment already?
They say in Management, not taking a decision is a vital decision itself.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Puppet for a Prime Ministe?
THE PRIME MINISTER OR PRADHAN MUNSHI?
Objective:
The burden of this note is that the PM is not a weak man. And that the weaknesses are in the situation in which he became PM and in which he is called upon to head the Government. Calling him a ‘puppet’ casts aspersions on him personally. Someone of his track record in the world of Political Economy, both international and national, does not have a ‘puppet’ mental frame of mind.
How he became PM?
The whole world knows the circumstances in which Dr. Manmohan Singh became the Prime Minister of India.
In the General Election of 2005, Sonia Gandhi as President of the Indian National Congress won a mandate to form the Government and did so with the help of Left n some other regional parties. However, for her own reasons, some very obvious, n some not so, she opted out of the office of the Prime Minister and anointed Dr. Manmohan Singh as the Prime Minister. She did not pay heed to many emotional appeals to reconsider her decision. Instead she chose to be chairperson of the UPA. No one can deny the fact that PM took the office as a proxy for the Congress President, who remains very much on the scene with some serious responsibilities of her own.
The structure of GOI:
Thus from 2005 onwards we have a government with some obvious division of labour. Mrs. Gandhi takes care of the politics of governance and Dr. Manmohan Singh takes care of the business of Government: something similar to the CEO n COO in corporate parlance. In such a set up, it is quite obvious who holds the upper hand. The CEO of course! So is the COO a puppet in the hands of the CEO? There are obvious pros/cons in this Organization structure and therefore many corporations combine the jobs of Chairman n Managing Director. That makes for ‘strength.
Coalition Politics
Both Mrs. Gandhi and Dr Manmohan Singh head a multi party government. Quite obviously apart from sharing spoils of office, some of these parties have their own Agenda independent of the Congress. The nominees of these parties who are Ministers in this Government are more ‘responsive’ to their respective leaders. They are much less responsive to the Prime Minister or the Chairperson of the UPA. Therefore some of the incumbents won ministerial seats despite strong opposition from the PM (and from the Congress).
Constitutional Framework:
It is worth bringing into the picture the Constitutional nature of our Government. First the negative. Our’s is not a Presidential form of Government where the President is supreme and the Ministers really serve at his pleasure.
We follow the cabinet form of Government, in which the Prime Minister is First Among Equals. There is also the (much neglected) concept of ‘Joint responsibility’ in as much as all decisions (at least Policy Decisions) of the Government are decisions of the Cabinet. Individual cabinet members may air their views in the Cabinet. But the decision that comes out is a Join Decision of the Cabinet. The FM took shelter under this when he ‘declined’ to give his personal views on the Caste base census. The PM is also accused of ducking the question taking shelter under the “Cabinet Decision” format.
However, in practice, many of the Ministers have been announcing epoch making decisions in their personal capacity. It is a great pity of the situation that this Concept has not been assiduously used to ensure a united face of the coalition government. This concept should have been made an important bedrock of Coalition Dharma i.e. the ministers shall look to the Cabinet and the PM to bless their decisions or to the modify them and not take shelter under their regional party leaders. That is a missed opportunity.
What prompts the Puppet epithet?
It goes without saying that there must be a great deal of consultation between the PM and the Congress President in Policy formulation. Yet there have been occasions when the Congress President has “written’ to the PM in effect giving some direction. Such ‘written’ directions were meant as much to give a direction to the Government as to enable Congress to take political ownership of some decisions in the political one- up game. But this gives the impression that the PM is a Puppet n the strings are in the hands of the Congress president. On other occasions, the PM has had to ‘give in’ to predilections of the leaders of the Coalition partners e.g. Privatization of some PSUs in Tamil Nadu. In such cases, the strings seem to be in the hands of the Regional Leaders.
Personality of the PM
It is for all to see that the PM is not an egoist, keen to project himself at every occasion. He is soft spoken, but learned n thinking man. Neither was he a Puppet Governor of RBI nor was he a puppet Finance Minister who set
Some people are born politicians; some others have politics thrust on them. He became a politician via his skills in managing vast financial and economic institutions. Being a man of principles, n honest to a fault, he was valued by Congress leadership. It needs strength of character to remain honest in the midst of so much power n temptation. In the UPA I, he got to a stage when he said to the left “so be it” and carried the Congress leadership with him to clinch the Nuclear deal with the
As the saying goes, circumstances maketh the man. The circumstances made him the PM, and the circumstances themselves leave him limited room to exert the authority of his office and of his personal strengths.
IF I WERE THE PRIME MINISTER ADDRESSING THE PRESS CONFERENCE
THE ORIGINAL DRAFT OF THE TELEPROMPTER TEXT FOR THE PRIME MINISTER’S PRESS CONFERENCE.
The following was found in the file No. 13 in the PMO the day after the Press Conference.
ON INFLATION N ECONOMY:
We were getting along quite nicely with very low inflation in the first few years of our First tenure. The global meltdown, with the consequential need to pump in money into the economy fed the demand side. It was aggravated by increase in salaries of the Babus, and Aam Aadmi programs. Bad monsoons, and a ‘hardly working’ Agriculture n Food Minister starved the supply side. God is working on the Monsoon. The RBI n the FM are trying to calm the demand side. Indian cricket is in a mess, so the Agriculture n Food Minister might spend more time at his Desk. That is how we shall tame the beast of inflation.
ON
If you rule out the option of declaring War on
ON NAXALS
If I had my way, I would send all the civic society sympathizers of the Naxal movement on a world tour on one of the luxury liners so that they study 'separatist' movements around the world.. That will give the MHA the cease fire he wants. Having done that I would instruct the MHA to forget about the other ceasefire n meet with the Kishens n other leaders of the Naxals for 7 days of non stop negotiations n talks. If that does not work, I will hand the matter over to Joint force of Army, Police under the leadership of a retired General of the Army with an unlimited mandate.
ON TERRORISM
Honestly I don’t think
ON CASTE CENSUS
Many our CORE programs depend on demographic information. For example, Reservation for SC n STs, Reservation for OBC, Funding for BPL persons, Reservation for Women and most important Election Ticket distribution n Vote Banks. We will be shooting in the dark, if the Census does not provide us the demographic base for these programs. It is the essential Market Research that we need.
ON RAJA N CORRUPTION
Have you people forgotten that our’s is a coalition government and we have to observe coalition dharma. In any case, Raja has more than compensated the GOI for any loss he may caused in his earlier decision. Even the FM is grateful to Raja for creating ‘elbow room’ for him. You should be praising Raja for his 100K Crore bonanza to the Nation.
ON RAHUL GANDHI
The PM’s chair belongs to him by rights. His mother did not want him. So as her successor, it is his by right. I will vacate it the moment he is ready to give up his ‘freedom’.
ON ILLEGAL MINING IN ORISSA
If I had my way, I would put the culprits in Jail and ‘chaabi kho jai”.That should set an example.
ON THE SUPPORT OF THE LEFT
If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. I can not depend on Air
ON HIS LEGACY
The country will remember me as the Pradhan Munshi who became Pradhan Mantri.